The Worst That Could Happen

r

The Worst That Could Happen
r

r

By Wayne Epperson
r

r

This story appeared in the June 2004 issue of Web Host Industry Review magazine. Click here to subscribe for free.
r

r

July 16, 2004 — (WEB HOST INDUSTRY
r

REVIEW) — Any discussion by an assemblage of network security
r

practitioners is sure to include the latest technologies and effective
r

best practices for keeping infrastructures up and running in the face
r

of hackers, viruses and all manner of other electronic threats.
r

r

It’s an ongoing dialogue Web hosts could
r

be expected to attend to closely, but the rash of virus and worm
r

attacks that have menaced Web hosting providers in recent months – in
r

some cases bringing networks offline – seems to indicate that some
r

companies out there aren’t getting it right.
r

r

Any security discussion must examine how
r

a layered approach of firewalls, intrusion detection and prevention
r

systems and antivirus systems can protect business. But for a seasoned
r

specialist fighting cyber crime and preparing for the next attack, the
r

business of security demands a first-things-first approach.
r

r

“People tend to build security and then
r

try to stuff policy into it, and it doesn’t work that way. It’s the
r

other way around,” says Patrick Gray, director of X-Force operations,
r

the national emergency response and penetration testing practices unit
r

at Internet Security Systems (iss.net),
r

located in Atlanta. “Before we start deploying and thinking about best
r

practices, we have to assess our own risk if you are a hosting
r

provider.”
r

r

The first thing Gray’s staff generally
r

discovers on emergency response engagements to companies and hosting
r

providers is an exceedingly idle approach to the issues of policy that
r

surround network security.
r

r

“Policies, procedures and standards ought
r

to be documented and documented extremely well in how you do things.
r

That’s when you can take into consideration your security
r

architecture,” says Gray, a retired special agent with the FBI where he
r

headed a cyber crime task force. “Once we have our defense-in-depth in
r

place, we need to understand that something bad will happen. Not may
r

happen, but will happen. In this ever-changing environment, hosting
r

providers need to understand that and have procedures for responding to
r

an incident, be it a worm or virus outbreak or an internal problem,” he
r

says, adding that plans need to be tested in practice drills.
r

r

“A worm appears and you are hosting
r

somebody’s server farm and there’s a Web site going down. You need to
r

know exactly what to do right then and there as opposed to running a
r

fire drill like chickens with their heads cut off. It is incredibly
r

important that you have emergency response procedures on the books and
r

know exactly what to do.”
r

r

One hosting provider that Gray says has security figured out is Inflow Inc. (inflow.com) Based in Denver, Colorado, Inflow has 13 data centers across the United States.
r

r

Lenny Monsour, general manager of
r

Inflow’s hosting and infrastructure services, echoes Gray’s comments
r

about policies. “When I look at the way we handle any type of security
r

issue,” he says, “an important principle is to make sure that you
r

address the process and policy issues first, because it has got to be
r

driven from the business and the business has to support the
r

investments they are going to make from a security perspective.”
r

r

Patch management and email security are
r

two big concerns for Internet-based customers, and Inflow has
r

initiatives to address them, Monsour says.
r

r

“We just recently rolled out our
r

iServerCare services. There is a component of that service that helps
r

customers deal with the challenge of keeping up with patches and helps
r

them not just identify when critical patches come out, but be able to
r

audit their servers to figure out which patches aren’t on them.”
r

r

Inflow’s service automates the tracking of patches, audits the software and on demand pushes patches to selected servers.
r

r

“We have actually pushed a patch out to 400 different servers, all Windows machines, and we did it in two hours,” Monsour says.
r

r

Among the company’s many security
r

offerings is a managed email service for Exchange environments. By
r

managing Exchange servers, filters and antivirus software, Inflow helps
r

companies implement spam and email attachment scanning to remove
r

attachments before they reach a user’s desktop.
r

r

“For a lot of our customers who are more
r

security conscious, we will implement intrusion prevention
r

technologies, a service we base around the ISS Proventia platform,”
r

which includes 24×7 monitoring by a security team, Monsour says.
r

r

Joshua Chen, chief technology officer at
r

St. Louis-based Internet hosting center Cybercon, recommends a
r

three-layer approach to best security practices.
r

“We recommend the use of multiple
r

security devices, not just a firewall. We use a combined approach with
r

Cisco routers with package filtering, NetScreen firewalls and the Top
r

Layer Attack Mitigator for intrusion prevention. Each device works on
r

specific situations to give a broad range of protection,” Chen says.
r

Cybercon, like Inflow, provides managed
r

security services. “We purchase hardware, we install it, we monitor it
r

and we fix it. With all of this security equipment installed, servers
r

have to be updated. I find that a lot of problems with worms is that
r

servers are not patched and that can give hackers an opportunity to get
r

in.”
r

r

One of Chen’s customers is Chicago Webs (chicagowebs.com),
r

a Web hosting company that recently relocated its network to the
r

Cybercon data center from another provider’s facility near Chicago.
r

r

Pat Stangler, president of Chicago Webs,
r

knows first-hand the damaging effects that such an an attack can have
r

on an unsuspecting Web hosting company.
r

r

It started around 6 a.m. on the last
r

Thursday in July 2003 when the same strain of a distributed denial of
r

service attack that hit Microsoft, CNet and a handful of other large
r

sites over a two-day period targeted Stangler’s operation.
r

r

“We were getting hit with over 100 megs a
r

second and over a million SYNs a second. It was pretty intense. For a
r

day and a half we were down,” Stangler says.
r

r

The incident response team for the
r

company providing Chicago Webs with data center space at the time
r

wasn’t able to resolve the problem and told Stangler he needed to
r

deploy an intrusion prevention system to stop the attack. They referred
r

him to Top Layer Networks of Westboro, Massachusetts, for its Attack
r

Mitigator IPS.
r

By then it was Friday, and the earliest
r

Stangler could have the device delivered would be Monday. He flew from
r

Chicago to Boston Saturday morning, picked up the IPS and caught a
r

return flight back to Chicago.
r

r

“I had it implemented within 45 minutes
r

of hitting the ground and in another 30 minutes our network was back
r

up. The box is awesome; we haven’t had one second of downtime since
r

putting it in,” says Stangler, whose Chicago Webs mainly caters to the
r

development community and boasts of clients in every time zone.
r

r

To Stangler, a secure network means “the
r

livelihood of my clients. Period. That’s our business. We are not in
r

the ‘security’ business, but we have to be these days.”
r

r

It took a disaster, but Stangler got the
r

message. To those hosts that might prefer a faster, easier road to
r

understanding, Gray offers the abridged version.
r

r

“Tell them not to be comfortable,” he says. “Something bad is going to happen. Just be prepared for that.”
r

r

r

r

Leave a Comment