Solutions and Policy Combat Spreading Hate

r

Solutions and Policy Combat Spreading Hate
r

r

r

Rawlson O’Neil King, theWHIR.com
r

r

r

May 21, 2004 — (WEB HOST INDUSTRY
r

REVIEW) — The Internet has provided hate groups with formerly
r

inconceivable opportunities. Online racists, anti-Semites, and
r

anti-government extremists can reach a worldwide audience and can more
r

easily portray themselves as legitimate. Anyone using the Internet may
r

inadvertently be exposed to hate online. When uninformed or easily
r

influenced people – particularly children – come across hate
r

propaganda, they can fall prey to its deceptive reasoning and adopt
r

hateful beliefs themselves, sometimes going so far as to act on what
r

they have read.
r

r

Gauging the affects of online hate on the
r

vast population of Internet users presents enormous difficulties. No
r

reliable measurement has been taken of the number of Internet users who
r

find and read hateful material online. Nor can one safely generalize
r

about the ways in which this material affects the beliefs and actions
r

of those who read it.
r

r

New research however has revealed that
r

the amount of hate material on the Web is growing substantially.
r

Neo-Nazis, anti-Semites and racists are increasingly using the Internet
r

to get their message out, to recruit new members and open new channels
r

of communication among sympathizers, according to UK-based email
r

filtering company SurfControl (surfcontrol.com).
r

The company’s research has found that the number of hate and violence
r

Web sites has grown approximately 300 percent since 2000. At that time,
r

the firm was tracking 2,756 Web sites. By April 2004 however, the
r

number of Internet hate and violence sites under the company’s
r

surveillance had risen to 10,926.
r

r

SurfControl also found that number of
r

sites that promoted hatred against Jews, Muslims, Americans, Asians,
r

homosexuals and blacks, as well as gratuitous violence against these
r

groups, had risen by over 25 percent since the beginning of the year.
r

r

During 2003, the number of such sites was
r

up by only 30 percent. Susan Larson, SurfControl’s Vice President of
r

Global Content, contends that the increase in hate sites has been
r

driven by political, social and cultural conflicts, such as the Iraq
r

War and proposed legislation to deal with homosexual marriages.
r

r

“Our company has observed the convergence
r

of sites promoting violence and those advocating hate,” she states.
r

“Many hate sites have been created due to the polarization of religious
r

and political public opinion throughout the United States and the
r

globe.”
r

r

According to Larson, hate sites are
r

problematic due to the liability issues that they can create in the
r

workplace environment. Employee exposure to such material can increase
r

the risk of litigation against an employer on the basis of harassment
r

or discrimination. As a result, network administrators should exercise
r

extreme caution, and ensure the implementation of access management
r

policies that monitor and filter sites by hate groups.
r

r

SurfControl offers technology that can
r

effectively filters out objectionable content, such as hate, based on
r

specific criteria. When installed behind a firewall or proxy server,
r

SurfControl’s pass-by “sniffer” technology builds an accurate picture
r

of network traffic with no impact on network performance. It handles
r

all Internet protocols, so that an organization can filter SMTP, POP,
r

and NNTP as well as standard HTTP and FTP requests.
r

r

SurfControl can filter offensive traffic
r

with minimal network reconfiguration. The firm works to research,
r

harvest and categorize objectionable content. Network administrators
r

utilizing their technology then have the option to determine what
r

content should be screened and barred. Since the filtering system is
r

flexible, it can be designed to revolve around specific corporate
r

policy. This makes it a powerful tool against hate.
r

r

“We feel that all corporations should
r

implement a good, responsible filtering and educate their users on
r

proper network usage,” states Larson. “Network usage is always
r

evolving, so you need to involve end-users in protecting the network
r

and understanding what constitutes proper use.”
r

r

That involves the enforcement of
r

acceptable usage policies. Some hosting providers have actively
r

demonstrated their commitment to their AUPs. In July 2003, hosting
r

reseller Alabanza (alabanza.com)
r

removed an anti-Semitic site in accord with its policies, which forbid
r

the posting of objectionable material and permitted the removal of such
r

a site at its discretion.
r

r

Because hate speech is permissible and
r

protected under the First Amendment in the United States, the majority
r

of hate sites are situated there. For this reason, technological
r

solutions are required in corporate environments to filter them out.
r

r

Service providers are also well advised
r

to place restrictions against hate sites in their acceptable usage
r

policies. By so doing, they can avoid all the associated legal
r

(potential government investigations and lawsuits) and technical issues
r

(heavy bandwidth usage and site attacks) associated with hosting them.
r

No related posts.