On-Demand: Buzzword or Business Revolution?

r

On-Demand: Buzzword or Business Revolution?
r

r

r

by Dan Scobie, Star Managed Services
r

r

Special to theWHIR.com
r

r

April 28, 2004 — (WEB HOST INDUSTRY
r

REVIEW) — Several years ago I had a boss who had all the phrases. He
r

thought outside the box, real blue-sky stuff – a walking example of
r

style over substance. Meetings with him became the perfect opportunity
r

to win big prizes in the office game of “Buzzword Bingo.”
r

One phrase he didn’t use, but that
r

initially inspired the same reaction in me, is “on demand.” A couple of
r

years ago I remember that suddenly, instead of having a dial-up
r

account, I was being offered “connectivity on demand.” Classic buzzword
r

territory – nothing had changed apart from the way marketing people
r

wanted me to feel about it.
r

r

When I first encountered “hosting on
r

demand” I should have been equally sceptical. I thought I had that
r

already; when I ran out of capacity, I could simply order more servers
r

and expand the architecture.
r

r

Looking into it, however, I very quickly
r

realised that for the first time the phrase was more than a new
r

marketing initiative, and that hosting was perhaps the first area that
r

could benefit properly from on-demand provision.
r

r

The basic premise for any hosting
r

solution is that it serves a business requirement, usually specified in
r

financial terms. There will be objectives in terms of revenue
r

generation or there may be a functional specification. But this does
r

not easily translate into a number of servers or processors, or a
r

quantity of memory.
r

r

Hosting is very difficult to specify. At
r

some stage a guess will be made as to what is required to cope with an
r

expected amount of load. Traditionally, the established answer was
r

always to plan for peak load, as the most common specification from a
r

hosting solution is that the site can never appear ‘”slow.”
r

r

Take for example an electronic retail
r

site. Capacity will have been planned to cope with the level of demand
r

generated during the run up to Christmas. The difficulty comes because
r

this means that for the rest of the year the site is massively
r

over-specified and excessively costly.
r

r

The other main problem is in the
r

guesswork involved. Often it may be a good guess, but it’s possible
r

that the person responsible will be covering their back by being
r

overcautious in their estimation. This invariably leads to an excess of
r

costly equipment.
r

r

So how does an on demand environment help
r

solve these issues and get closer to meeting true business needs? To
r

fully understand how on demand creates a change in the hosting
r

environment we need to understand the critical difference.
r

r

Imagine you’re waiting for a bus in the
r

rain. A bus arrives and it’s already full. Demand is exceeding supply.
r

In a traditional hosting arena the bus company would need to order
r

more, or bigger buses. In an on-demand arena the bus extends to
r

accommodate all the passengers at this peak period, and then contracts
r

again afterwards to ensure running costs are kept to a minimum.
r

r

As this demonstrates, the most important
r

feature of an on demand architecture is that is allows you to be
r

confident about the environment you implement. Why worry about whether
r

or not you can cope, if capacity can be increased as and when it is
r

required?
r

r

You can start small and then increase capacity, literally on demand, therefore only paying for what you use.
r

r

The key to this is a process dubbed
r

“orchestration.” This is the brain of the system, using various
r

monitors to make decisions about the suitable capacity level for the
r

environment and the requirements being placed upon it.
r

That means the environment knows when to
r

add hardware, and when to take it away based on predetermined levels.
r

It can add additional servers to a configuration and make them
r

functional in minutes.
r

r

The best thing about such orchestration
r

is that it can appeal beyond the enterprise level e-tailer, and work at
r

a more basic level. It could apply, for example, to a site located on a
r

shared server. When the site gets busy enough to require its own
r

environment, it can be automatically promoted to that level. The system
r

can be scaled to a particular need. And it means that you do not need
r

an on-demand budget. In providing its service, for example, Star is
r

making a commitment that we will never exceed the cost of an equivalent
r

fixed-cost environment.
r

There are therefore significant
r

advantages to be gained, for companies of all sizes, from hosting on
r

demand. It may be new, but finally a phrase has made it beyond Buzzword
r

Bingo, and could instead lead a business revolution.
r

r

About The Author
r

r

Dan Scobie is business solutions manager
r

of Star Managed Services, a division of Star Internet, a leading
r

independent UK ISP with more than 4,000 business customers.
r