CDN Providers Take on Applications

r

CDN Providers Take on Applications
r

r

r

Rawlson O’Neil King, theWHIR.com
r

r

r

June 11, 2004 — (WEB HOST INDUSTRY
r

REVIEW) — Rampant content delivery competition has created a race
r

among providers to incorporate “application logic” within their service
r

offerings. While typical CDNs have traditionally cached static and
r

dynamic data and propagated delivery nodes so that Web content can be
r

delivered to Internet surfers faster, the new generation of CDNs has
r

begun to incorporate the capacity to cache Web programming.
r

r

Mirror Image (mirror-image.com),
r

a content delivery network provider, has developed a managed solution
r

that not only allows the delivery of personalized Web content based on
r

geography, language, connection speed, or device, but also permits the
r

‘offloading’ of server scripts and programming onto its network. The
r

firm’s advanced application delivery network lets its customers
r

outsource requests for Web pages normally generated by costly
r

application servers to its own architecture, enabling customers to
r

manage traffic surges and growing demand without massive and costly Web
r

infrastructure investments.
r

r

“Application logic that is normally
r

executed as middleware can be run directly from within our edge
r

network,” states Robert Hammond, Mirror Image’s chief technology
r

officer. “Our rule-based environment allows our customers to deploy
r

logic directly in our network or concurrently allows us to code up
r

their logic for them.”
r

r

One of the firm’s customers, Poindexter Systems Inc. (poindextersystems.com),
r

has elected to deliver its entire ad-serving tool through Mirror
r

Image’s adaptive network. The tool provides publishers and advertisers
r

with trafficking, campaign management and full-detail reporting.
r

r

“In order for growing advertising service
r

providers to be successful, it is imperative they have the on-demand
r

capacity necessary to handle varying traffic loads as well as rich and
r

dynamic content,” says Frank Brilliant, Mirror Image’s vice president
r

for sales and marketing. “Our model allows them full control.”
r

r

Brilliant claims that full control is
r

afforded to Mirror Image customers due to the aggregated model that the
r

company employs. Instead of using a hugely distributed computing
r

platform like its competitor Akamai (akamai.com),
r

which has over 14,000 servers deployed in 1,100 networks in 70
r

countries, Mirror Image has aggregated all of its network resources in
r

23 specific “content access points” around the world.
r

r

“Our customers stated that they want full
r

visibility and control over the resources,” says Brilliant. “We feel
r

that only the aggregate model provides a high level of control,
r

security and manageability.”
r

r

Akamai, in contrast, provides a
r

distributed model, but one that also supports the execution of Java
r

Server Pages, servlets, and JavaBeans on the edge of the Internet, thus
r

avoiding network latency and the need for costly infrastructure
r

over-provisioning, while improving the performance and reliability of
r

mission critical enterprise applications.
r

r

Under the firm’s “EdgeComputing” model,
r

applications are separated into two layers: a centralized origin layer
r

and a distributed edge layer. The edge layer is deployed onto the
r

Akamai network and is composed of presentation and business components
r

optimized for the edge. The developer selects these components based on
r

the interfaces supported and the data access patterns, helping to
r

minimize the communication between the edge and the enterprise data
r

center. This allows the developer to offload infrequently changing data
r

and interface components to the edge, reducing expensive roundtrips to
r

the origin site. Components such as product catalogs, dealer
r

information, and shopping carts can be cached and processed locally to
r

deliver fast and reliable applications.
r

r

Another CDN competitor, Speedera Networks (speedera.com)
r

also recently deployed a distributed application hosting service for a
r

select number of its preferred clients. The service, entitled “flex
r

computing”, will allow the provider to incorporate application logic
r

into its own distributed global network. The company expects to
r

formally announce the new service within 30 to 60 days.
r

r

“Given that the delivery of Web content
r

and applications has become so critical, our company has dedicated
r

itself to providing customized and tailored solutions that are very
r

much adapted to our customers’ industries and their specific needs,”
r

says Speedera marketing chief Gordon Smith. For this reason, the
r

company has embarked on a mission to deploy its flex computing
r

initiative.
r

r

The service rollout will occur with a
r

lawsuit pending against the company. A sure indication of rampant
r

competition within the industry, Mirror Image recently announced it
r

filed suit against Speedera, claiming that it infringed on two patents
r

concerning content delivery technologies.
r

r

Mirror Image contends in the suit filed
r

in Delaware’s US District Court that Speedera infringed on one patent
r

related to “the use of a collaborative server system and methods for
r

efficient allocation of delivery of content from multiple servers,
r

enabled by use of embedded object references in Web pages.”
r

r

It also claims that Speedera infringed on
r

a second patent related to “methods of using alternative addresses in
r

distributed delivery of content to end-users, particularly in
r

intercepting requests for content and automatically serving requested
r

content from alternative servers.”
r

r

Mirror Image originally filed the suit
r

last fall and then amended and re-filed it in January. Though the
r

lawsuit is public record, it was not reported in the press until
r

recently. The suit is scheduled for trial in July 2005, and will add to
r

the already heated, competitive conditions within the CDN marketplace.
r

Speedera is actively opposing the action.
r