April 24, 2007 -- (WEB HOST INDUSTRY REVIEW) -- According to a report by ZDNet Australia, a class action lawsuit spearheaded US attorney E Clarke Dummit, and targeting Web hosting provider RegisterFly, is gaining steam as a growing number of customers allege that their domains have been lost or their businesses have been interrupted down by the embattled provider in the last year.
Customers involved in the action say sites hosted by RegisterFly have been disappearing over the last year, as domains are parked, usually after the domain has expired. But customers claim that attempts to renew domains have failed suspiciously.
ZDNet quotes Justin Kulhawick, who operates RegisterFlies.com, a site through which he gathers complaints against the company. He says RegisterFly is using the parked domains to make money from advertising traffic, or selling the domains to other customers.
Kulhawick and Dummit say the RegisterFly issue has yet to be understood for the scandal it is.
Dummit's class action suit - against RegisterFly CEO Kevin Medina, director John Naruszewicz and associated companies Unifiednames and Hosting Services Group, as well as domain registrar eNom and ICANN - is gaining momentum around the world, with customers from Australia signing up too. There are 700 plaintiffs so far.
According to Dummit, 75,000 customers have lost their domains. He says the value of dollars lost can't be calculated, as some customers' businesses were shut down suddenly. He says the lawsuit will seek damages, and will seek to have RegisterFly shut down.
He also says that ICANN has been neglectful in its duty to protect customers. RegisterFly's ICANN accreditation was revoked on March 16, but the company was still operating a month later. ICANN, he says, should have shut the company down months ago.
According to ZDNet, ICANN reported on April 17 that RegisterFly had been ordered by the US Federal Court to hand over accurate data for its registry entries.
Please check your facts as I, John Naruszewicz, am not being sued by Dummit. I am only named as an agent in the lawsuit on the basis that I could help the case against ICANN and Kevin Medina with the knowledge that I have. posted by: John Naruszewicz | April 24, 2007 11:46AM
As is mentioned in the story, some of the information we posted came from a ZDNet article, which also refers to the lawsuit as being "against" John Naruszewicz.
The court filing that I looked at here http://www.registerfly-lawsuit.com/registerfly-documents/filings/20070313Filings/20070313Complaint.pdf also lists John Naruszewicz among the defendants "in his capacity as an agent of both Unifiednames and RegisterFly."
I'm not sure I understand the distinction you're making. posted by: Liam Eagle | April 24, 2007 05:55PM