During the Copenhagen Climate Summit, carbon offsets are a topic for discussion. Carbon offests are “essentially a service whereby the purchaser pays someone else to create greenhouse gas reductions on his or her behalf” (The Suzuki Foundation). Since the inception of the Kyoto Protocol, they have been a popular mechanism to encourage awareness about climate change, and to reduce carbon emissions. However, according the US News “officials [at Copenhagen] will be considering which types of offset programs work and can actually be enforced,” because “there’s a big potential for fraud here.” To date, there is no formal regulation of carbon offsets, and there are a number of concerns with their use.
Groups that promote action on climate change have long argued that carbon offsets can “promot[e] innovation, help[] to make clean energy projects more economically viable, and allow[] people to take responsibility for their entire carbon footprint, including emissions that can’t be effectively reduced.” However, these same organizations make it VERY clear that “offsets are not a replacement for direct action by individuals, businesses or organizations to reduce their own carbon footprints” (Suzuki Foundation). Carbon offsets are only a solution after businesses and individuals have made as many changes as possible to reduce their carbon footprints.
Unfortunately, experience has shown that carbon offsets don’t actually encourage behavior changes. In fact, carbon offsets are beginning to be seen as a way for people and businesses to “assuage their guilt” by buying a “get out of jail free card.”
Yet many Web Hosting companies and data centers are building “green” marketing campaigns based on the fact that they are purchasing carbon offsets, without providing any evidence that they have actually made efforts to reduce the carbon they produce. This is, in my opinion, greenwashing, and makes it hard for businesses to find truly green hosting solutions.
No related posts.











