Small Business SaaS: Different Approaches from BT, 1&1 and GoDaddy

Dennis Howlett has the scoop on British Telecom's version of AppExchange (Salesforce.com's ecosystem for 3rd party developers). Last week, BT made a presentation to 200 software companies at Microsoft's UK HQ. BT's customer base includes 27 million consumers and 1.8 million small businesses; it wants to develop a marketing and distribution channel for 3rd party SaaS apps. It hinted that successful partners may find themselves acquired over time. (Last November Silicon.com noted that BT has a dedicated team of scouts who identify, evaluate and acquire hundreds of new technologies per year.)

BT cites an IDC survey that's summarized here by David Terrar. It showed that "the value of software is no longer determined by the functionality available, but by users' feelings and experience as they interact with the solution." Also, end users want predictable licensing and maintenance costs, and they prefer having their applications managed by someone else. IDC concludes that SaaS growth (20%/year) will far outpace software growth (6%). (In a 2005 report, IDC estimated that the web hosting market will grow by 16%/year through 2010.)

I agree with Dennis that the actual extent of BT's success matters less than their validation of SaaS. And like David, I'm intrigued by the BT/Microsoft relationship. The recent launch of BT Workspace, an online collaboration service that's somewhat competitive to Office Live was not mentioned at the Microsoft-sponsored presentation. (BT Workspace is powered by a modified version of Microsoft Sharepoint, though. BT co-branded it from SMBLive.)

Anyway, that's BT's story. If you think they're a British phone company, check out this Business 2.0 article on their world domination plans. Which includes web hosting. In the US corporate market.

Meanwhile, 1&1 is also broadening its portfolio. Last week I got a free trial invite for its new online conferencing service, which 1&1 co-branded from Spreed. I'm not excited about the silo-ed approach, where customers are given separate logins for Spreed. I hope 1&1 will consider integrating this with their Sharepoint service, so that customers can host live meetings as well as share files asynchronously.

At this point, GoDaddy seems to be lagging in the SaaS race. The company recently launched Hosting Metropolis, a "social tool" for helping its 1 million+ shared hosting customers choose between 30 free applications they can install. But where's the recurring revenue in that? I really think multi-tenant SaaS beats single user apps - for both service providers and end users.

One of the Web hosting industry's longest-standing citizens, Isabel Wang is also a high-tech enthusiast. Through her WHIR blog, she examines the impact emerging Web technologies will have on the Web hosting business, and on the motivations of hosting consumers. Isabel has been in the web hosting ... (Read full bio)

Comment anonymously or log into your WHIR account

Logging in allows enhanced commenting features (such as external linking) in news, features, blogs and more.

User:

Pass:

(reset password)

Don't have an account yet? Register now!


 

Comment by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Small business SaaS is going to be huge I think. Is anyone doing it with open source solutions? I can envision a company selling everything a small business needs (as SaaS) and keeping their operating expenses low by avoiding all the software licensing fees.

Comment by Anonymous on Thursday, January 25, 2007

Hi John,

There's no free lunch... I'm guessing it would be possible to put together a suite of open source SaaS solutions. The problem is, you don't have unlimited manpower, and so will only be able to evaluate/integrate/market/support a finite number of apps. This means you're assuming some level of risk if any of the apps you choose don't attract any subscribers.

The beauty of Salesforce's approach is, they pass the risk onto 3rd party software providers. They pay a fee to join Salesforce's ecosystem, they're responsible if there isn't a market for their apps.

Comment by Anonymous on Friday, January 26, 2007

If you are looking for an open source alternative, check out SugarCRM. Sugar has recently rolled out its own open source application marketplace. I agree that there is no free lunch, Sugar is not in business to give away software. CEO John Roberts uses the term "commercial open source" to describe the business.

Comment by Anonymous on Friday, January 26, 2007

Commercial Open Source? I like that!! John might enjoy this Wired article on European Union research that shows open source generates 263 billion Euros in annual revenue - and services related to open source software could read 32% of all IT services by 2010.

http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/01/huge_new_study_.html

Comment by Anonymous on Monday, February 19, 2007

Check out www.jamcracker.com they have SaaS delivery platform & vendor neutral ecosystem called JSDN (http://jsdn.jamcracker.com) .

OLDER: These Numbers Make Me Dizzy | NEWER: HTML 5: the next generation, or largely a pointless effort?